Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

In Part 6 of this series I began rewriting some of the embed code from the UpdateDetail procedure in the Invoice app as a reusable, testable class. Although I simply showed some test code on its own, that code lives inside a ClarionTest-compatible test DLL.

If you're following along, read Creating a ClarionTest test DLL for instructions on how to create a new test DLL. 

The first test procedure

Click on New Procedure and add a procedure called Test_CreateDetail_SetPriceAndQuantity_VerifyExtended.

In the Select Procedure Type dialog click on the Defaults tab and choose Test Procedure. Make sure you're on the Defaults tab, not the Templates tab!

You'll notice that the procedure properties have been preloaded with a prototype and parameters. Do not change these values or the test procedure will not work and may cause a GPF in ClarionTest or your DLL.

Now, right-click on the procedure and choose Source to bring up the Embeditor

There really are only two embeds you need to be concerned about in the test procedure. One is the data embed, where you declare any data you need for the test. The other is Priority 5000, right before the return statement. That's where you place your test code.

Here's the code for the data embed:

detail  InvoiceDetail

And here's the code for the source embed:

    detail.Init(12.50,3)
    AssertThat(detail.GetExtended(),IsequalTo(37.50),'Wrong detail value')

Once you've entered the code your test procedure should look like this in the embeditor:

 

Save and compile the DLL. You'll get something like seven errors.

Clearly there's a problem because you haven't yet defined the class!

An easy way to create classes

There are a number of ways you can declare classes in Clarion; some of them are fraught with danger. For instance, if you create classes that you export from a DLL so they can be used elsewhere, you had better get everything just right or you'll probably be looking at GPFs.

For purposes of this article, I'll follow the approach I outlined in Quick starts for classes

 Using the Quick Starts described in that article (or by creating a file from scratch, create a file called InvoiceDetail.inc with the following contents:

InvoiceDetail       Class,Type,module('InvoiceDetail.clw'),link('InvoiceDetail.clw',1)
GetExtended             procedure,real
Init                    procedure(real price,long quantity)
                    End 

Next create InvoiceDetail.clw:

                                            member
                                            map
                                            end
    include('InvoiceDetail.inc'),once

InvoiceDetail.GetExtended                   PROCEDURE
    code
    return 0
 
InvoiceDetail.Init                          procedure(real price,long quantity)    
    code 
Now go back to the DLL APP file again. On the global embeds choose the After Global INCLUDEs embed point and insert the following source:
Include('InvoiceDetail.inc') 

Save the embed. 

You should now be able to compile the DLL.

Setting up ClarionTest

There's one more thing you should do now to make unit testing as painless as possible, and that's to set up ClarionTest in the Tools menu. Choose Tools | Options, and from the list of Options choose Tools again. Click on Add to create an new external tool entry. Set the Command field to point to ClarionTest.exe, and set the Arguments field to ${TargetPath} as in Figure 8.

Figure 8. Setting up ClarionTest as an external tool

With the test DLL as the active window in the IDE, choose Tools | Run unit tests. You should see the ClarionTest window with the test DLL loaded, as in Figure 9.

Figure 9. Loading the test DLL

You'll notice that the procedure name is in all caps - that's how the symbol is exported from the DLL. The procedure name is reformatted after the test is run, based on information returned by the test.

Press the Run All button. You should see a test failure, as in Figure 10.

Figure 10. Test failure

GetExtended just returns zero. Change the class code to store the price and quantity in private variables, as follows:

    
    Section('Header')
InvoiceDetail       Class,Type
GetExtended             procedure,real 
Init                    procedure(real price,long quantity)
price                   real,PRIVATE
quantity                long,PRIVATE
                    End 

    Section('Methods')
InvoiceDetail.GetExtended   PROCEDURE
    code
    return self.price * self.quantity
    
InvoiceDetail.Init  procedure(real price,long quantity)    
    CODE
    self.price = price
    self.quantity = quantity

Yes, I realize I'm using a real for the price - bear with me for a little while.

Compile the DLL.

If you exited the ClarionTest application, restart it from the Tools menu. If you still have it up just press Reload. Then press Run All. The test should now pass.

Now, how about getting the discount amount? That involves two things: setting a discount percentage rate and calculating the discount. Really there are two things to test: Is the discount amount right, and is the total right? Let's start with the discount amount.

Create a new procedure called Test_CreateDetail_SetDiscount_VerifyDiscount. Select Test Procedure from the Template Types dialog, Defaults tab.

Or just highlight the first test, press Ctrl-C, then type in the new name. That will save a bit of setup typing.

Change the test code in this new procedure to

    detail.Init(12.50,3)
    detail.SetDiscountRate(10)
    if detail.GetDiscount() <> 3.75        
        tr.message = 'Expected discount of 3.75, got ' & detail.GetDiscount()
    else
        tr.passed = TRUE
    end

Of course the test won't compile.

You'll get a number of unknown procedure errors field not found errors. That's because you don't have the SetDiscountRate, GetDiscount or GetTotal methods in the class. Add the declarations in the class header:

GetDiscount             procedure,real
SetDiscountRate procedure(real discountRate)

And the implementation of the method (I've set GetDiscount to return 0 as a default):

InvoiceDetail.GetDiscount           procedure
    code 
    return 0
    
   
InvoiceDetail.SetDiscountRate       procedure(real discountRate)
    code 
    self.discountRate = discountRate

Here's a little tip to making finding the compile error easier. If you've mistyped something or otherwise caused an error in the include file, do not (at least in 7.0) double-click on the error in the error list - the IDE will take you to program file that contains the Include statement. Instead just look in the include file. The error(s) will be highlighted.

Run the test - it fails, because there's no code to calculate the actual discount.

InvoiceDetail.GetDiscount   PROCEDURE
    code 
    return self.discountRate / 100 * self.GetExtended()

And what do you know - it works!

Figure 11. Two tests pass!

But wait - that result conveniently rounds out to a single decimal place. What happens if you use, say, a value of $11.45 and a discount of 11%? Plug that into your calculator and 3 * 11.45 * .11 = 3.7785. That's not an acceptable currency value. It should round up to 3.78. And in fact the test returns 3.7785, which is a failure.

You could Round() the result, but a better solution is simply not to use floating point numbers for financial calculations! Use decimal types instead. Here's an updated GetDiscount():

InvoiceDetail.GetDiscount   PROCEDURE
result    decimal(10,2)
    code 
    result = self.discountRate / 100 * self.GetExtended()
    return result

I've also changed the DiscountRate variable to a Decimal(10,2). The Clarion Help file explains the rules under which the BCD (binary coded decimal) library is invoked - see Decimal Arithmetic in the index. The numeric constant (100) is a decimal, as is DiscountRate, and as long as one side of a mulitiplication is a decimal that will be a BCD operation as well (GetExtended returns a real). I store the resulting value in a temp decimal var for rounding purposes, and then return that value (again as a real).

But why don't I just use decimals entirely, instead of reals? Mainly because decimals have to be passed by address and can't otherwise be a return value. I find that a bit clunky. I'm not aware of any problems with passing the data as reals in this scenario, and if there are they should be uncovered by the unit tests ....

More tests

Figure 12 shows the remainder of the tests, which while not yet exhaustive do a reasonable job of covering the bases.

Figure 12. The test suite

You can find the code for the class in the downloadable source.

Implementing the class

Adding the class to the Invoice app is the same as adding it to the test DLL: just add the same two global include statements. And in the UpdateDetail procedure, add this line in the data section:

detail  InvoiceDetail

Then, in the CalcValues routine, replace the existing embed code with this code:

    detail.Init(DTL:price,DTL:QuantityOrdered)
    detail.SetTaxRate(DTL:TaxRate)
    detail.SetDiscountRate(DTL:DiscountRate)
    DTL:TaxPaid = detail.GetTax()
    DTL:Discount = detail.GetDiscount()
    DTL:TotalCost = detail.GetTotal()
    DTL:Savings = detail.GetSavings()

You could, in fact, create an overloaded Init() method to take the tax and discount rates as well, and reduce this code from seven lines to five.

You'll also have to put the InvoiceDetail.clw file somewhere it can be found. That means either putting it in a directory that's already listed in the redirection file (such as the Clarion libsrc directory) or updating the redirection file. You may want to set up a source directory for just your own classes.

Summary

The original routine contained a hodgepodge of untestable, difficult to reuse code tied directly to a particular database.

The class that replaces that code isn't tied to any one database, can be reused easily without duplicating any business logic, and has an accompanying test suite to verify its behavior.

Extracting embed code into testable, reusable classes does involve some work, but the payoff is huge. You get verifiable code, and not just in the development phase. You can make changes to the class with much less risk of breaking existing code. If your unit tests are comprehensive, they'll catch any errors introduced by enhancements or even other bug fixes.

Tip: If you're using NetTalk, I'm told you need to add the "Suppress NetTalk" global extension in the test DLL.

Download the source

  • No labels